Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Look What I Found...
MANHUNT a.k.a. "Roydyr"
Henriette Bruusgaard
Now, before you get too excited, this is definitely a "good news, bad news" situation. The good news? 1. The damsel is very realistically gagged. 2. Under normal circumstances, (Y'know, when she hasn't had the crap beat out of her.) the DiD is pretty cute. 3. Decent close-ups, albeit short scene.
The bad news? Too much, unfortunately. 1. There's lot's of putz action, not only in this scene, but later on as well. 2. (Spoiler Alert!!!!) The flick starts out with 3 gals and several dudes. 2 of the 3 gals are killed fairly right off, so the bondage that follows are mostly putz's, with the notable exception of our scene above. 3. For a gag so supposedly well tied, she get's free pretty damn quick. TOO damn quick, if you ask me.
One last thing. I haven't actually watched this entire flick, but from what I saw FF through to pick out the DiD stuff, this has got some fairly brutal stuff, as in "FRONTIERS" level, give or take, so be warned if you're squeamish.
Henriette Bruusgaard
Now, before you get too excited, this is definitely a "good news, bad news" situation. The good news? 1. The damsel is very realistically gagged. 2. Under normal circumstances, (Y'know, when she hasn't had the crap beat out of her.) the DiD is pretty cute. 3. Decent close-ups, albeit short scene.
The bad news? Too much, unfortunately. 1. There's lot's of putz action, not only in this scene, but later on as well. 2. (Spoiler Alert!!!!) The flick starts out with 3 gals and several dudes. 2 of the 3 gals are killed fairly right off, so the bondage that follows are mostly putz's, with the notable exception of our scene above. 3. For a gag so supposedly well tied, she get's free pretty damn quick. TOO damn quick, if you ask me.
One last thing. I haven't actually watched this entire flick, but from what I saw FF through to pick out the DiD stuff, this has got some fairly brutal stuff, as in "FRONTIERS" level, give or take, so be warned if you're squeamish.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Belated Memorial Day Thanks
My main computer's RAID 1 configuration has been acting up, at rare intervals, for several months now and decided to act up again Sunday night. More on this later, but the main gist is that I was unable to post until now, Tuesday morning.
So, a past due, but extremely heartfelt Memorial Day THANK YOU to all of our current military personnel and to all those who gave their lives for our nation in wars and battles past.
Writings like our Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are just powerless words on paper without those who would defend and enforce the ideals contained within, often with their very lives. Who can ask for a greater personal sacrifice than that?
Then, of course, there are those "Americans" who so hate the (American) military and those who serve, as to yes, spit, on a veteran.
I can't even remotely fathom people like this. While I grudgingly support their right to peacefully protest, spitting on someone is about as low as you can get. What is so sadly ironic is that these morons don't get that the very military they hate is what gives them the actual ability to behave this way.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Rant Of The Day
Rant...
Yesterday, I saw yet another news article that spoke of a woman, this time a teacher, accused of having sexual relations with one of her students, some 17-year-old guy. If convicted, she could spend several years in prison.
This is Debra Lafave, who, at the age of 23, was accused statutory rape (Having sex) with a 14-year-old boy. She was reported to the cops by the kid's mother. Gee thanks for nothing mom! She was fired, rightfully so, but later charges were dropped so she spent no time in prison. In this case, justice was served. But I would never forgive ma for messing up my dream.
This is Carrie McCandless, who, at 29, hooked up with a 17-year-old. The DA was trying to wack her with a 20 year sentence!
Say huh? Years? Years... in prison? For that? Are you kidding me?
Before I get into the meat of my rant, let me get this out of the way: I am not, in any way, advocating adults having sex with minors. And if we're talking grown men sexually assaulting underage girls (Or boys, for that matter) I'm very much OK with prison time. And if we're talking adult males hooking up with very young girls, I'm all for extremely harsh punishment.
No, I'm strictly speaking about adult women having sex with "boys", and while I'm not saying it's something to be condoned, I am saying that, IMO, prison is far, far, to severe.
Hear me out. Boys and girls are different. Yeah, yeah, I know, women supposedly like sex as much as guys. That might be true at some point, under certain conditions, but it sure ain't true during those early puberty years. Speaking from experience, when puberty hits guys, (Usually around 12, give or take a year or so) we turn into walking hard-ons.
There's an old saying about getting hard when the wind blows. Shit, at that age, who needed wind? Sitting in class, totally focused on a math equation? Spoooinnng... here's Waldo! Anytime, anywhere, little Vinnie would suddenly decide to come out and play.
And, while it never takes young fellas much time to instinctively learn and perfect (Practice, practice, practice...
) the fine art of One Man Tug-O-War, it's also instinctively known that it would be infinitely, off-the-charts more enjoyable when female's love tunnel is involved.
I guess what I'm saying is, where, exactly, is the real crime here? I promise you, I guarantee it in a stone cold motal lock, that NO guy, of any age, has ever, or will ever, complain about some decently good-looking woman, of any age, offering him sex. Not-gonna-happen, folks. Not unless some head-shrinker talks him into it.
And this stuff about boys being "emotionally scarred" by the experience? Give me a frakin' break. That's utter, psycho-babble bullshit. All I can say is, every guy I know wishes they had been "emotionally scarred" like that. I can think of two or three teachers I had back when that I would have given anything to be so scarred.
There are, of course, limits. Once you drop into prepubecent range, even though the boy would still not complain, I get a bit icky about that. But, some teenager? Especially a frakin' 17-year-old? Go to prison for that?
That's just more PC nonsense run amok. Again, I don't think the woman should be applauded. Certainly, she should be fired and probably not allowed to teach again, but jail time is far and away an overreaction for the "crime".
Yesterday, I saw yet another news article that spoke of a woman, this time a teacher, accused of having sexual relations with one of her students, some 17-year-old guy. If convicted, she could spend several years in prison.
This is Debra Lafave, who, at the age of 23, was accused statutory rape (Having sex) with a 14-year-old boy. She was reported to the cops by the kid's mother. Gee thanks for nothing mom! She was fired, rightfully so, but later charges were dropped so she spent no time in prison. In this case, justice was served. But I would never forgive ma for messing up my dream.This is Carrie McCandless, who, at 29, hooked up with a 17-year-old. The DA was trying to wack her with a 20 year sentence! Say huh? Years? Years... in prison? For that? Are you kidding me?
Before I get into the meat of my rant, let me get this out of the way: I am not, in any way, advocating adults having sex with minors. And if we're talking grown men sexually assaulting underage girls (Or boys, for that matter) I'm very much OK with prison time. And if we're talking adult males hooking up with very young girls, I'm all for extremely harsh punishment.
No, I'm strictly speaking about adult women having sex with "boys", and while I'm not saying it's something to be condoned, I am saying that, IMO, prison is far, far, to severe.
Hear me out. Boys and girls are different. Yeah, yeah, I know, women supposedly like sex as much as guys. That might be true at some point, under certain conditions, but it sure ain't true during those early puberty years. Speaking from experience, when puberty hits guys, (Usually around 12, give or take a year or so) we turn into walking hard-ons.
There's an old saying about getting hard when the wind blows. Shit, at that age, who needed wind? Sitting in class, totally focused on a math equation? Spoooinnng... here's Waldo! Anytime, anywhere, little Vinnie would suddenly decide to come out and play.
And, while it never takes young fellas much time to instinctively learn and perfect (Practice, practice, practice...
) the fine art of One Man Tug-O-War, it's also instinctively known that it would be infinitely, off-the-charts more enjoyable when female's love tunnel is involved.I guess what I'm saying is, where, exactly, is the real crime here? I promise you, I guarantee it in a stone cold motal lock, that NO guy, of any age, has ever, or will ever, complain about some decently good-looking woman, of any age, offering him sex. Not-gonna-happen, folks. Not unless some head-shrinker talks him into it.
And this stuff about boys being "emotionally scarred" by the experience? Give me a frakin' break. That's utter, psycho-babble bullshit. All I can say is, every guy I know wishes they had been "emotionally scarred" like that. I can think of two or three teachers I had back when that I would have given anything to be so scarred.
There are, of course, limits. Once you drop into prepubecent range, even though the boy would still not complain, I get a bit icky about that. But, some teenager? Especially a frakin' 17-year-old? Go to prison for that?
That's just more PC nonsense run amok. Again, I don't think the woman should be applauded. Certainly, she should be fired and probably not allowed to teach again, but jail time is far and away an overreaction for the "crime".
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Comic Bonds: Emma Frost Has Rude Awakening
In Uncanny X-Men #509, Emma Frost finds herself in a real bind...
The pertinent question is, what's 'ol Scott gonna do when he finds her? Set her loose of course, but, y'know, maybe not immediately...
Heh, heh, heh...
The pertinent question is, what's 'ol Scott gonna do when he finds her? Set her loose of course, but, y'know, maybe not immediately...
Heh, heh, heh...
Rant Of The Day
RANT...
Definitive evidence that there is truly no justice in the world.
I realize JLH ain't quite the mouthwatering, uber-hottie, Lord-take-me-now-cause-I-just-saw-heaven, muffin she was a decade or so before, but chunky (At times) or not, on what frackin' planet does Jamie Kennedy get to tap that?????? A man who's name and words like "funny", "comedian", and "actor" should never be in the same sentence except when prefixed with the word "not"?
Definitive evidence that there is truly no justice in the world.
I realize JLH ain't quite the mouthwatering, uber-hottie, Lord-take-me-now-cause-I-just-saw-heaven, muffin she was a decade or so before, but chunky (At times) or not, on what frackin' planet does Jamie Kennedy get to tap that?????? A man who's name and words like "funny", "comedian", and "actor" should never be in the same sentence except when prefixed with the word "not"?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
